June 2010
Posted by: Research
As Dean Of Harvard Law School, Kagan Praised The University’s Decision To Ban Military Recruiters From Harvard’s Campus Over The Military’s Ban On Openly Gay Service Members. “‘This return to our prior policy will allow [the Office of Career Services] to enforce the law school's policy of nondiscrimination without exception, including to the military services,’ the dean, Elena Kagan, wrote in a brief statement late yesterday. ‘I am gratified by this result, and I look forward to the time when all law students will have the opportunity to pursue any legal career they desire.’” (Jenna Russell, “Harvard Law School Bans Military Recruiters Over Anti-Gay Policies,” The Boston Globe, 12/1/04)
As Dean, Kagan Even Encouraged Students To “Forcefully” Protest Against The Military. “Kagan wrote in her message that she hopes “many members of the Harvard Law School community will accept the Court’s invitation to express their views clearly and forcefully regarding the military’s discriminatory employment policy.”” (Paras Bhayani, “HLS To Abide By Court’s Decision,” The Harvard Crimson, 03/08/06)
As Solicitor-General, Kagan Failed To Review The 9th Circuit’s Decision Undermining The Military’s Application Of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Law. “The Obama administration has decided to accept an appeals-court ruling that could undermine the military's ban on service members found to be gay. A federal appeals court in San Francisco last year ruled that the government must justify the expulsion of a decorated officer solely because she is a lesbian. The court rejected government arguments that the law banning gays in the military should have a blanket application, and that officials shouldn't be required to argue the merits in her individual case.” (Jess Bravin and Laura Meckler, “Obama Avoids Test On Gays In Military,” The Wall Street Journal, 5/19/09)
And In August 2009, Kagan’s Office Filed A Brief In A California Case Challenging The Defense Of Marriage Act, Stating That “This Administration Does Not Support DOMA As A Matter Of Policy, Believes That It Is Discriminatory, And Supports Its Repeal.” (US District Court For The Central District Of California, “Reply Memorandum”, Case No. SACV09-00286 DOC (MLGx), 8/24/09)