Nov
Posted by: Jeffrey Berkowitz
1 CommentsEarlier this week, a New York Times article highlighted Maine as an example of a state that has tried to reform its health care system but has been unsuccessful. In an effort to lower costs and cover more people, Maine created a public plan, expanded Medicaid, thought about mandating coverage, and more. Why is Maine significant? Because the policies Maine tried are the same ones House and Senate Democrats favor. Take a look:
Maine is the Charlie Brown of health care. The state’s legislators have tried for decades to fix its system, but their efforts have always fallen short: health insurance premiums are still among the least affordable in the nation, health care spending per person is among the highest and hospital emergency rooms are among the most crowded. Indeed, many overhauls to the system have done little more than squeeze a balloon — solving one problem while worsening another… Maine’s history is a cautionary tale for national health reform. The state could never figure out how to slow the spiraling increase in medical costs, hobbling its efforts to offer more people insurance coverage. Many on Capitol Hill have criticized national reform legislation for similarly doing little to tame costs.
The warning signs are out there, but Congressional Democrats haven’t taken them seriously and opted to advance government-run health care. Maybe they should look to Maine as an example of what not do to. If they did, they’d be reminded that government-run health care, will force doctors out of business, increase premiums, and place a financial burden on young Americans.
1 CommentsPosted by Jeanette Baust on 2009-11-13T03:06:22.137
I've decided to write to Dems, Repubs, and any others when the data just doesn't gel and the rhetoric is over the top. How about if we all just make our arguments and try to figure out how to make our nation as good as it can be? Your article was strewn with hyperbole and a number of questionable ideas and "facts." I heard and read a number of reports that said during exit poling that many in Virginia and most in NJ said their votes were not referendums on Obama. In addition, you note that Maine "thought about" making insurance mandatory. That was the crux of the argument. They did not make it mandatory, resulting in skyrocketing costs and insurance companies unwilling to extend coverage because the young and the healthy wouldn't join the pool. Give us fair analysis -- please. We deserve it.
Page 1
Want to join the conversation? Please Login!
 November 2009 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | |
| 29 | 30 | ||||||
Paid for by the Republican National Committee
Not Authorized By Any Candidate Or Candidate's Committee
www.GOP.com
